EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ransohoff, D. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ransohoff, D. F
Topic Collections
Right arrow EBM Diagnosis
Evidence-Based Medicine 2005; 10:55
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.


Diagnosis

Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation performed well in detecting colorectal polyps

Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004;127:1300–11.[CrossRef][Medline]

Q What is the diagnostic performance of low dose multidetector computed tomographic colonography (CTC) without bowel cathartic preparation compared with optical colonoscopy for detection of colonic polyps?

Clinical impact ratings IM/Ambulatory care ******{star} Oncology *****{star}{star} Gastroenterology *****{star}{star} Geriatrics *****{star}{star}

Key Words: colonic polyps • colonography (computed tomographic)

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
{ebmflochart.f1}Design: blinded comparison of CTC with optical colonoscopy.

{ebmglobe.f1}Setting: a university hospital in Rome, Italy.

{ebmpatient.f1}Patients: 203 patients >=35 years of age (mean age 61 y, 69% men) who were scheduled to have optical colonoscopy because of average risk colorectal cancer screening, personal or family history of colorectal polyps, family history of colorectal cancer, abnormal screening test result, iron deficiency anaemia, haematochezia, change in bowel habits, abdominal pain, or weight loss. Exclusion criteria were history of familial adenomatous polyposis or hereditary non-polyposis cancer syndromes; previous colorectal surgery; suspected inflammatory bowel disease, bowel obstruction, or acute diverticulitis; contraindications to bowel preparation or iodine containing contrast agents; or pregnancy.

{ebmtestube.f1}Description of test: foecal tagging was done using an oral iodinated contrast agent, which patients ingested during the 5 principal meals 48 hours before CTC. CTC was done using a multidetector helical CT scanner. The colon was insufflated with room air with patients . . . [Full text of this article]

David F Ransohoff, MD

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.