EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, J. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, J. F
Topic Collections
Right arrow EBM Quality improvement
Evidence-Based Medicine 2005; 10:91
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.


Quality improvement

A series of evidence-based drug therapy letters improved prescribing behaviour

Dormuth CR, Maclure M, Bassett K, et al. Effect of periodic letters on evidence-based drug therapy on prescribing behaviour: a randomized trial. CMAJ 2004;171:1057–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Q Do evidence-based drug therapy letters affect the prescribing behaviour of physicians to newly treated patients?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ******{star}

Key Words: physician’s practice patterns • prescriptions (drug) • drug utilisation

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
{ebmflochart.f1}Design: cluster randomised controlled trial.

{ebmclsdenvelop.f1}Allocation: concealed.*

{ebmhalfeye.f1}Blinding: blinded {clinicians, patients, and outcome assessors}{dagger}.*

{ebmhourglass.f1}Follow up period: 3 months (8 wks for letters #7 and #8).

{ebmglobe.f1}Setting: 24 local health areas (LHAs) in British Columbia, Canada.

{ebmpeople.f1}Participants: a 10% sample of prescribing physicians from the 24 LHAs: 499 physicians (mean age 46 y, 86% men, 90% general practitioners). The patient populations were (i) residents of British Columbia who were >=66 years of age between 1993 and 1998, lived at home or in a continuing care institution, and had been eligible for Pharmacare coverage for >=1 year (people who had made no claim in the preceding year for any drug among the drug classes included in the letters were "at risk" of a first prescription); and (ii) a younger patient population, which was used to measure the effect of a letter on the management of asthma.

{ebmrx.f1}Intervention: 24 LHAs were . . . [Full text of this article]

John F Steiner, MD, MPH

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Denver, Colorado, USA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.