HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by KING, D. B Articles by TOUMPAS, C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by KING, D. B Articles by TOUMPAS, C.

Clinical skills textbooks fail evidence-based examination

¹ Centre for General Practice, School of Medicine, University of Queensland
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
² Dept of Family Medicine, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
³ Queensland Health Department
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Key Words: diagnosis • evidence-based medicine • medical education

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

BACKGROUND
Despite advances in "technological" medicine, the history and physical examination still provide the correct final diagnosis in the majority of cases^1,2 and remain the cornerstone of clinical medicine.³ Medical students spend a great deal of time learning these techniques. Students continue to be taught the long case "complete history and physical," despite its inefficiency and errors. Bordage⁴ claims "you see what you are looking for," and gathering further data fails to increase diagnostic accuracy. Educational research suggests diagnostic accuracy depends on both mastery of knowledge and sound problem solving strategies.⁵ Students can learn to problem solve more expertly by using schemes that assist storage and retrieval of clinical knowledge, rather than rote memorisation of lists and "dispersed" knowledge.^5,6

Diagnosis involves gathering clinical information and then refining the probability of a particular diagnosis after acquiring each piece of evidence. The elements of history and examination can be considered as individual "diagnostic" . . . [Full text of this article]