Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Evidence-Based Medicine 2006;11:35-38; doi:10.1136/ebm.11.2.35
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

EBM notebooks

The GATE frame: critical appraisal with pictures

Rod Jackson, MBChB, PhD1, Shanthi Ameratunga, MBChB, PhD1, Joanna Broad, MPH1, Jennie Connor, MBChB, PhD1, Anne Lethaby, MA1, Gill Robb, MPH1, Sue Wells, MBChB, MPH1, Paul Glasziou, MBBS, PhD2, Carl Heneghan, BM, BCH2

1 University of Auckland
Auckland, New Zealand
2 Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine
Oxford, UK

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

INTRODUCTION

Epidemiological evidence about the accuracy of diagnostic tests, the power of prognostic markers, and the efficacy and safety of interventions is the cornerstone of evidence-based health care.1 Practitioners of evidence-based health care require critical appraisal skills to judge the validity of this evidence. The Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) Working Group members are international leaders in teaching critical appraisal skills, and their users’ guides for appraising the validity of the healthcare literature2 have long been the basis of teaching programmes worldwide. However, we found that many of our students took a reductionist "paint by numbers" approach when using the Working Group’s guides. Students could answer individual appraisal questions correctly but would have difficulty assessing overall study quality. We believe this is due to a poor understanding of epidemiological study design. So over the past 15 years of teaching critical appraisal we have modified the EBM Working Group approach and developed the Graphic . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kool, B, Ameratunga, S, Jackson, R (2009). The role of alcohol in unintentional falls among young and middle-aged adults: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Inj. Prev. 15: 341-347 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wood, L., Egger, M., Gluud, L. L., Schulz, K. F, Juni, P., Altman, D. G, Gluud, C., Martin, R. M, Wood, A. J G, Sterne, J. A C (2008). Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 336: 601-605 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schwartz, M. D, Dowell, D., Aperi, J., Kalet, A. L (2007). Improving journal club presentations, or, I can present that paper in under 10 minutes. Evid. Based Med. 12: 66-68 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.