EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Evidence-Based Medicine 2006;11:58; doi:10.1136/ebm.11.2.58
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Web-only table
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wyer, P. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wyer, P. C
Topic Collections
Right arrow EBM Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Review: medical history, physical examination, and routine tests are useful for diagnosing heart failure in dyspnoea

Wang CS, FitzGerald JM, Schulzer M, et al. Does this dyspneic patient in the emergency department have congestive heart failure? JAMA 2005;294:1944–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Q In patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with dyspnoea, how useful are medical history, physical examination, and readily available tests in diagnosing heart failure (HF)?

Clinical impact ratings Internal medicine ******* IM/Ambulatory care ******* GP/FP/Primary care ******{star} Emergency medicine ******{star} Cardiology *****{star}{star}

Key Words: dyspnea • heart failure, congestive • emergency service, hospital

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
Formula Data sources Medline (1966 to July 2005) and reference lists of relevant articles and textbooks.

Formula Study selection and assessment English language studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of elements of the history, physical examination, or readily available tests in adults with undifferentiated dyspnoea presenting to the ED. The reference standard was diagnosis by a panel of physicians based on clinical signs and symptoms and an appropriate measure of cardiac dysfunction. 2 reviewers independently assessed the studies for inclusion and methodological quality.

Formula Outcomes pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) for HF, calculated using a random effects model.

MAIN RESULTS
22 studies met the selection criteria, but only 18 high quality studies were included. Features assessed in >1 study and found to be useful in diagnosing HF are in the table on the website (www.evidence-basedmedicine.com). Findings that were useful for ruling in and ruling out HF are summarised in the conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS
. . . [Full text of this article]

Peter C Wyer, MD

Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, New York, USA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.