EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Evidence-Based Medicine 2006;11:120; doi:10.1136/ebm.11.4.120
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eikelboom, J. W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eikelboom, J. W

Clinical prediction guide

The Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index predicted major bleeding in patients taking warfarin

Aspinall SL, DeSanzo BE, Trilli LE, et al. Bleeding Risk Index in an anticoagulation clinic. Assessment by indication and implications for care. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:1008–13.[CrossRef][Medline]

Q In patients taking warfarin, how accurate is the Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index for predicting major bleeding?

Clinical impact ratings Internal medicine ******{star} Cardiology ******{star} Haematology ******{star} Neurology *****{star}{star}

Key Words: anticoagulants • haemorrhage

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
Formula Design: retrospective cohort study to validate the previously developed Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index in a veteran population.

Formula Setting: a pharmacist run anticoagulation clinic at the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Formula Patients: 1269 patients (mean age 68 y, 92% men, 82% white) taking warfarin for <1 to >36 months.

Formula Description of prediction guide: the Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index (range 0–4) is a summation of 4 factors: (i) age (>=65 y = 1), (ii) history of stroke = 1, (iii) history of gastrointestinal bleeding = 1, and (iv) presence of >=1 serious comorbidity (recent myocardial infarction, haematocrit <30%, serum creatinine concentration >1.5 mg/dl, or diabetes mellitus = 1). The index categorised patients into 3 risk groups: high risk (score of 3–4), intermediate risk (score of 1–2), and low risk (score of 0). Bleeding episodes were identified through quality assurance reports. Poisson regression analysis was used to determine the . . . [Full text of this article]

John W Eikelboom, MD

McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.