Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Evidence-Based Medicine 2006;11:130-131; doi:10.1136/ebm.11.5.130-a
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

EBM notebook

Making sense of diagnostic tests likelihood ratios

Rafael Perera, DPhil, Carl Heneghan, BA, MRCGP

University of Oxford Department of Primary Health Care
Oxford, UK

Key Words: 2011

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


A smart mother makes often a better diagnosis than a poor doctor.
August Bier German, professor of surgery 1861–1949.

Statistical diagnosis is a mystery to many health practitioners.1 Information is often presented as test accuracy (sensitivity and specificity). However, at the bedside we need to know how a test result predicts the diagnosis or outcome of interest. Attempts to demystify approaches to diagnosis include the construction of 2 by 2 boxes, nomograms, and rules such as SpPin (with a Specific test the Positive Rules in) and SnNout (with a Sensitive test the Negative Rules out). In our teachings of evidence-based medicine, we have found an easier, intuitive way to interpret the results of diagnostic studies based on 2 elements: the likelihood ratio of the test and the pretest odds.

The likelihood ratio (LR) summarises information about the diagnostic test by combining information about the sensitivity and specificity. It tells . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.