Evidence-Based Medicine 2006;11:136; doi:10.1136/ebm.11.5.136
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
EBM notebook
Evidently...*
Department of Primary Care, Oxford University
Oxford, UK
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The human spine, particularly its lowest 5 segments, has come in for a lot of criticism; but we should not forget that it also provides a living for millions of people such as osteopaths, chiropractors, acupuncturists, reflexologists, plus manufacturers of orthopaedic beds, TENS machines, and other purveyors of "guaranteed relief." For most doctors, however, back pain is just a pain. Patients come to us expecting a diagnosis and some rational treatment, but with chronic back pain, all we can do is share their frustration and learn a bit of humility. In the UK, physiotherapy (physical therapy) has always been incorporated into the NHS whereas manipulative therapies have not. A British cost utility analysis ( Spine 2006;31:13817[CrossRef][Medline] ) finds that it makes no difference whether a physiotherapist gives active treatment or just advice. "Back schools" have also become a popular way of. . . [Full text of this article]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
