Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Evidence-Based Medicine 2006;11:142; doi:10.1136/ebm.11.5.142
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Therapeutics

Delivery of 100%, 40%, and blow-by humidity did not differ for change in croup scores in children with moderate croup

Scolnik D, Coates AL, Stephens D, et al. Controlled delivery of high vs low humidity vs mist therapy for croup in emergency departments: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006;295:1274–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Q In children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with moderate croup, what is the relative effectiveness of 100% humidity with optimally sized water particles, 40% humidity, and humidity delivered by the blow-by technique?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ******{star} Respirology ******{star} Emergency medicine *****{star}{star}

Key Words: croup • emergency service (hospital) • humidity • nebulisers and vaporisers

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS

Formula Design: randomised controlled trial.

Formula Allocation: {concealed}*.{dagger}

Formula Blinding: blinded (healthcare providers, data collectors, and {data analysts}*).{dagger}

Formula Follow up period: 30 and 60 minutes.

Formula Setting: ED at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Formula Patients: 140 children 3 months to 10 years of age (mean age 25 mo, 69% boys) who presented with croup lasting <=1 week and had Westley croup scores >=2 out of 17 after a 30 minute rest period. Exclusion criteria were need for immediate nebulised epinephrine or intubation, potential alternative cause of stridor, history of intubation, chronic systemic or pulmonary disease other than asthma, use of glucocorticoids in the previous 48 hours or epinephrine in the previous 4 hours, or non-English speaking caregivers.

Formula Intervention: children were allocated to 100% humidity using a special apparatus to control droplet size (n = 46), 40% relative humidity (n = 46), or blow-by humidity (placebo) (n = 48). The . . . [Full text of this article]

Peter C Wyer, MD

Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons,
New York, New York, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Glossary
Evid. Based Med. 2006 11: 159a. (in Glossary) [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.