EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Evidence-Based Medicine 2006;11:142; doi:10.1136/ebm.11.5.142
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wyer, P. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wyer, P. C
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Therapeutics

Delivery of 100%, 40%, and blow-by humidity did not differ for change in croup scores in children with moderate croup

Scolnik D, Coates AL, Stephens D, et al. Controlled delivery of high vs low humidity vs mist therapy for croup in emergency departments: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006;295:1274–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Q In children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with moderate croup, what is the relative effectiveness of 100% humidity with optimally sized water particles, 40% humidity, and humidity delivered by the blow-by technique?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ******{star} Respirology ******{star} Emergency medicine *****{star}{star}

Key Words: croup • emergency service (hospital) • humidity • nebulisers and vaporisers

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
Formula Design: randomised controlled trial.

Formula Allocation: {concealed}*.{dagger}

Formula Blinding: blinded (healthcare providers, data collectors, and {data analysts}*).{dagger}

Formula Follow up period: 30 and 60 minutes.

Formula Setting: ED at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Formula Patients: 140 children 3 months to 10 years of age (mean age 25 mo, 69% boys) who presented with croup lasting <=1 week and had Westley croup scores >=2 out of 17 after a 30 minute rest period. Exclusion criteria were need for immediate nebulised epinephrine or intubation, potential alternative cause of stridor, history of intubation, chronic systemic or pulmonary disease other than asthma, use of glucocorticoids in the previous 48 hours or epinephrine in the previous 4 hours, or non-English speaking caregivers.

Formula Intervention: children were allocated to 100% humidity using a special apparatus to control droplet size (n = 46), 40% relative humidity (n = 46), or blow-by humidity (placebo) (n = 48). The . . . [Full text of this article]

Peter C Wyer, MD

Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons,
New York, New York, USA


Related Article

Glossary
Evid. Based Med. 2006 11: 159a. (in Glossary) [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.