EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Evidence-Based Medicine 2006;11:155; doi:10.1136/ebm.11.5.155
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinshenker, B. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weinshenker, B. G
Topic Collections
Right arrow EBM Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Review: magnetic resonance imaging alone is of limited usefulness in diagnosing multiple sclerosis

Whiting P, Harbord R, Main C, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: systematic review. BMJ 2006;332:875–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Q How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS)?

Clinical impact ratings IM/Ambulatory care *****{star}{star} Internal medicine *****{star}{star} Neurology *****{star}{star}

Key Words: magnetic resonance imaging • multiple sclerosis

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
Formula Data sources: 12 electronic databases (to September or November 2004), reference lists, and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence MS guidelines.

Formula Study selection and assessment: published and unpublished studies in any language that evaluated the accuracy of MRI for early diagnosis of MS in patients presenting with suspected disease. 18 prospective cohort studies (n = 2102) and 11 studies of other designs (mainly case control, n = 2527) met the selection criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) criteria were used to assess quality of individual studies.

Formula Outcomes: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs), and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) (the odds of positivity in people with MS, divided by the odds of positivity in people without MS).

MAIN RESULTS
In general, the quality of the studies was poor, with few studies reporting blinding. The pooled diagnostic OR for the accuracy of MRI for diagnosis of MS . . . [Full text of this article]

Brian G Weinshenker, MD

Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, Minnesota, USA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.