EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Evidence-Based Medicine 2007;12:25; doi:10.1136/ebm.12.1.25
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chessman, A. W
Right arrow Articles by Detar, D T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chessman, A. W
Right arrow Articles by Detar, D T.
Topic Collections
Right arrow EBM Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Review: history and physical examination can accurately identify migraine and the need for neuroimaging in patients with headache

Detsky ME, McDonald DR, Baerlocher MO, et al. Does this patient with headache have a migraine or need neuroimaging? JAMA 2006;296:1274–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Q In patients with headache, do features of the history and physical examination accurately identify those with migraine and those who should undergo neuroimaging?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care *****{star}{star} IM/Ambulatory care ******{star} Neurology ******{star} Emergency medicine *****{star}{star}

Key Words: diagnostic techniques, neurological • headache • migraine disorders

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
Formula Data sources: Medline (to November 2005) and reference lists of primary studies, review articles, and textbooks.

Formula Study selection and assessment: studies that assessed the usefulness of history and physical examination in predicting the diagnosis of a migraine type headache using International Headache Society criteria applied by a neurologist as the gold standard, and the presence of significant intracranial pathology in adults with non-traumatic headache using neuroimaging as the gold standard. Studies assessing patients with a specific underlying chronic disease were excluded. 4 studies of migraine (n = 1210, mean age range 39–40 y, prevalence 50–89%) and 11 studies of neuroimaging (n = 3725, mean age range 35–52 y, prevalence of abnormality 0–64%) met the selection criteria.

Formula Outcomes: positive (+LR) and negative (–LR) likelihood ratios.

MAIN RESULTS
The 4 studies evaluating screening tests for migraine (mainly in patients without aura) used different clinical prediction rules, so the results could not be pooled. Headache . . . [Full text of this article]

Alexander W Chessman, MD, D Todd Detar, DO

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
C. Donald and J. Wyatt
Sophia
Emerg. Med. J., June 1, 2007; 24(6): 452 - 452.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.