EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Evidence-Based Medicine 2007;12:4-7; doi:10.1136/ebm.12.1.4
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, I.
Topic Collections
Right arrow EBM Notebook

EBM notebook

The evolving science of translating research evidence into clinical practice

Ian Scott, FRACP, MHA, MBBS

Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Key Words: evidence-based medicine

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Practising clinicians have to swim in an ocean of clinical research evidence that varies in rigour, consistency, and applicability to the care of individual patients. They are expected to stay up to date, be authoritative, and practice to a high standard. They work in an environment that obliges them to reconcile patient preferences and societal/professional expectations with the need for cost restraint and accountability for quality and safety of care.

Numerous reports of variations in practice patterns1 and substandard care2 have placed increased pressure on clinicians, healthcare institutions, and professional organisations to improve their ability to provide optimal care. This is essential for the continuation of public trust and funding from public and private payers. While standards of care may not be definable in the absence of definitive evidence, the fact that clinical practice in many instances appears to be at odds with even clear-cut research evidence has become of . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
T. Stephenson
Improving patient safety in paediatrics and child health
Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 650 - 653.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
D. Venes
The evolving science of translating research evidence into clinical practice
Evid. Based Med., August 1, 2007; 12(4): 102 - 102.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.