|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Diagnosis |
Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Obstetrics






Obstetrics 





Key Words: labour presentation physical examination pregnancy complications prenatal diagnosis
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
METHODS
Design:
blinded comparison of clinical examination and ultrasonography.
Setting:
antenatal clinic in tertiary obstetric hospital in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Patients:
1633 women (mean age 31 y) with a singleton pregnancy at 3537 weeks gestation.
Description of test:
clinical examination to assess fetal presentation was performed as part of routine antenatal care by residents or registrars (55% of examinations), midwives (28%), or obstetricians (17%).
Diagnostic standard:
ultrasound examination of the fetus using a hand held machine.
Outcomes:
sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.
MAIN RESULTS
In 130 women (8.0%), the fetus was in non-cephalic presentation: 6.3% in breech presentation and 1.7% with transverse or oblique lie. The diagnostic characteristics of clinical examination, compared with ultrasonographic assessment of fetal presentation, are shown in the table
. Both sensitivity (38%) and specificity (89%) were poor in obese women. In women at the lower end of the gestational age range (3435 weeks), clinical examination was
Gavin Young, MBBS, FRCGP, DRCOG
Temple Sowerby Medical Practice
Penrith, UK
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |