EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Evidence-Based Medicine 2007;12:77; doi:10.1136/ebm.12.3.77
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wyer, P. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wyer, P. C

Therapeutics

Etomidate had shorter induction and recovery times than midazolam for fracture reduction

Di Liddo L, D’Angelo A, Nguyen B, et al. Etomidate versus midazolam for procedural sedation in pediatric outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:433–40.[CrossRef][Medline]

Q In children and adolescents presenting with a displaced extremity fracture who require sedation, does etomidate show faster onset and recovery than midazolam?

Clinical impact ratings Emergency medicine ******{star} Paediatrics (general) ******{star}

Key Words: analgesics (non-narcotic) • etomidate • fractures (closed) • hypnotics and sedatives • manipulation (orthopaedic) • midazolam • pain

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
Formula Design: randomised controlled trial.

Formula Allocation: concealed.*

Formula Blinding: blinded (patients, investigators, {data collectors, outcome assessors, and data analysts}{dagger}).*

Formula Follow up period: up to discharge.

Formula Setting: emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care paediatric hospital.

Formula Patients: 100 patients 2–18 years of age (mean age 8.7 y, 50% boys) who presented to the ED with a displaced extremity fracture requiring sedation and analgesia for closed reduction. Exclusion criteria included respiratory tract infection, haemodynamic instability, recent head injury, known seizure disorder, heart or lung disease, craniofacial anomaly, adrenocortical dysfunction, pregnancy, allergy to study drugs, consumption of solids <6 hours or liquids <2 hours previously, and inability to obtain intravenous (IV) access.

Formula Intervention: etomidate, 0.2 mg/kg (maximum 10 mg) (n = 50) or midazolam, 0.1 mg/kg (maximum 5 mg) (n = 50) administered in a slow IV push. Fentanyl was administered for analgesia to both groups in titrated doses to a maximum of 2 . . . [Full text of this article]

Peter C Wyer, MD, FACEP

Columbia University,
New York City, New York, USA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.