Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The Manchester Self Harm Rule had good sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting repeat self harm or suicide

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


 
 Q In patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with self harm, can a simple clinical rule predict repetitions of self harm or suicide in the next 6 months?

Clinical impact ratings Paediatrics (general) ★★★★★★☆ Psychiatry ★★★★★★☆ Emergency medicine ★★★★★☆☆

METHODS

Embedded ImageDesign:

prospective cohort study with separate derivation and validation data sets.

Embedded ImageSetting:

5 EDs in Manchester and Salford, UK.

Embedded ImagePatients:

9086 episodes of self harm (intentional self poisoning or self injury) in patients 11–98 years of age (median age 30 y, 56% women). Patients who did not wait for assessment or refused treatment were excluded.

Embedded ImageDescription of prediction guide:

the patient was considered to be at moderate or high risk of repeat self harm or suicide if any 1 of the 4 components of the Manchester Self Harm Rule was present: (1) history of self harm, (2) previous psychiatric treatment, (3) current psychiatric treatment, or …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • For correspondence: Dr J Cooper, Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. jayne.cooper{at}manchester.ac.uk

  • Sources of funding: Manchester Health Authority; South Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust; Central Manchester and Manchester Children’s University Hospitals NHS Trust; Pennine Acute NHS Trust; Mental Health Services of Salford NHS Trust.