EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Evidence-Based Medicine 2007;12:115; doi:10.1136/ebm.12.4.115
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow web only table
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thien, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thien, F.

Therapeutics

Once daily oral controller therapy with low dose theophylline or montelukast was not effective in poorly controlled asthma

The American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers. Clinical trial of low-dose theophylline and montelukast in patients with poorly controlled asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:235–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Q In patients with poorly controlled asthma while taking medication, what is the effectiveness of adding once daily oral controller therapy to low dose theophylline or montelukast?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ******{star} IM/Ambulatory care *****{star}{star} Respirology ******{star} Allergy & immunology *****{star}{star}

Key Words: acetates • anti asthmatic agents • asthma • leukotriene antagonists • quinolines • theophylline

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
Formula Design: randomised placebo controlled trial.

Formula Allocation: {concealed*}{dagger}.

Formula Blinding: blinded (clinicians, patients, {data collectors, outcome assessors, and data safety and monitoring committee}{dagger}).*

Formula Follow up period: 24 weeks.

Formula Setting: 19 American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centres (ALA-ACRC) in the US.

Formula Patients: 489 patients >=15 years of age (mean age 40 y, 74% women, 61% white) who were diagnosed with asthma, were prescribed daily asthma medication for >=1 year, had FEV1 >=50% of the predicted value, and had poor asthma control (score >=1.5 on the Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ]). Patients continued their baseline medications. Exclusion criteria were use of oral corticosteroids, leukotriene antagonists, or theophylline within 4 weeks before randomisation; >=20 pack years history of smoking; or significant illness.

Formula Intervention: theophylline, 300 mg/day (n = 161); montelukast, 10 mg/day (n = 164); or placebo (n = 164).

Formula Outcomes: annualised rate of episodes of poor asthma control (EPAC) (composite end . . . [Full text of this article]

Francis Thien, MD, FRACP

Box Hill Hospital and Monash University,
Victoria, Melbourne, Australia







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.