EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Evidence-Based Medicine 2007;12:150; doi:10.1136/ebm.12.5.150
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow web only appendix
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirsch, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirsch, C.
Topic Collections
Right arrow EBM Diagnosis

Diagnosis

A short version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was as accurate as the original MMSE for predicting dementia

Schultz-Larsen K, Lomholt RK, Kreiner S. Mini-Mental Status Examination: a short form of MMSE was as accurate as the original MMSE in predicting dementia. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:260–7.[CrossRef][Medline]

Q In home dwelling elderly people, is a short version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as accurate as the original MMSE for predicting dementia?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ******{star} GP/FP/Mental Health ******{star} Psychiatry ******{star} Geriatrics *****{star}{star}

Key Words: dementia • mental status schedule

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
Formula Design: blinded comparison of the original MMSE and a short version of MMSE with neuropsychological examination.

Formula Setting: a centre for elder research in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Formula Patients: 243 home dwelling elderly people {75–83 years of age (mean age 80 y, 47% men)}* who had the original MMSE screening. 28% of them screened positive {based on MMSE cut-point of 26/27}*.

Formula Description of tests: 2 dichotomous subscales obtained from the Rasch item analysis were A-MMSE (age correlated scale) including orientation to time, attention/calculation, naming, repetition, 3 stage command; and B-MMSE (not correlated with age) including orientation to place, registration, recall, reading, and copying. A new scale model was D-MMSE consisting of all B-MMSE items with a polytomous scoring of the "3 object recall" item (see further details of D-MMSE and its instructions for administration at www.evidence-basedmedicine.com).

Formula Diagnostic standard: a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery including 30 subtests.

Formula Outcomes: sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio . . . [Full text of this article]

Calvin Hirsch, MD

UC Davis Medical Centre,
Sacramento, California, USA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.