THERAPEUTICS
Self-monitoring of blood glucose did not improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes not treated with insulin
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A Farmer
Dr A Farmer, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; andrew.farmer@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
STUDY DESIGN
randomised controlled trial (Diabetes Glycaemic Education and Monitoring [DiGEM] study).
concealed.*
blinded (laboratory staff).*
STUDY QUESTION
48 general practices in Oxfordshire and South Yorkshire, UK.
453 patients
25 years of age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (mean age 66 y at study entry, 57% men, median duration of diabetes 3 y) who were managed with diet or oral hypoglycaemic agents alone, had haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level
6.2% (mean 7.5%), and were independent in activities of daily living. Exclusion criteria included serious disease and use of a blood glucose meter
2 times/week in the previous 3 months.
self-testing by use of a blood glucose meter 3 times daily 2 days/week, with instructions to contact their physician if readings were consistently high or low (self-testing group, n = 150); self-testing (as above) plus training in timing, interpreting, and using the test
1 Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
2 National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Caution Warranted
- John B Waits
- EBM Online, 28 Nov 2008 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
