THERAPEUTICS
Review: delayed or immediate prescriptions of antibiotics have similar clinical outcomes in respiratory infections
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
G Spurling
Dr G Spurling, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; geoffspurling@optusnet.com.au
REVIEW PROCESS
in patients with respiratory infections, how does prescription of delayed antibiotics (ABs) compare with immediate or no ABs?
Medline (1966 to January 2007), EMBASE/Excerpta Medica (1990–2007), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2006), Current Contents—ISI Web of Knowledge (1998 to January 2007), and bibliographies of relevant studies.
randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any language comparing prescriptions of delayed ABs (>48 h) with that of immediate or no ABs for acute respiratory tract infections (included otitis media, common cold, or sore throat) in patients of any age. Quality assessment of individual studies was measured on an 11-point scale based on criteria that included randomisation, allocation concealment, comparability of intervention groups, blinding, follow-up, and intention to treat analysis; scores
6 indicate high quality. 9 RCTs met the selection criteria and had quality scores
6.
included clinical outcomes (pain, fever, malaise, or
The Tamilnadu Dr MGR Medical University, Chennai, India
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
