Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Systematic or opportunistic screening was more effective than usual care for detecting new cases of atrial fibrillation

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

F D Hobbs

Dr F D Hobbs, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; f.d.r.hobbs@bham.ac.uk

STUDY DESIGN

Design:

cluster randomised controlled trial.

Allocation:

unconcealed.*

Blinding:

blinded (cardiologists).*

STUDY QUESTION

Setting:

50 general practices in the UK.

Patients:

14 802 patients ⩾65 years of age (mean age 75 y, 43% men). Exclusion criteria included patients who were terminally ill, had moved, or were disqualified by the general practitioner.

Intervention:

25 practices (n = 9866) were allocated to screening and 25 practices (n = 4936) were allocated to usual care. Patients in the screening practices were allocated to systematic (routine electrocardiography) (n = 4933) or opportunistic (selective electrocardiography for symptoms or irregular pulse) (n = 4933) screening. Clinicians in the screening practices were given educational materials on the importance of detecting AF and …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Source of funding: NHS research and development health technology assessment programme.