DIAGNOSIS
Accuracy of ECG interpretation in primary care was limited for detecting atrial fibrillation
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
D A Fitzmaurice
Dr D A Fitzmaurice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; d.a.fitzmaurice@bham.ac.uk
STUDY QUESTION
What is the accuracy of different types of electrocardiography (ECG) and different interpreters for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care?
STUDY DESIGN
blinded comparison of 3 types of ECG interpreted by 3 different groups with 12-lead ECGs read by cardiology consultants (substudy of a randomised controlled trial [Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly, SAFE]).
49 primary care practices in central England, UK.
2595 patients from the SAFE intervention group (
65 y) who were identified for an ECG because of an irregular pulse on opportunistic screening (n = 238) or were selected randomly to have a 12-lead ECG (n = 2357).
1 of 3 ECG types was randomly selected for each patient (847 single chest-lead, 858 limb-lead, and 848 12-lead). Batches of 100 ECGs were sent for interpretation to 2 primary care practitioners (1 physician and
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical School Dublin, Ireland
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Falk, G., Fahey, T.
(2008). Accuracy of ECG interpretation in primary care was limited for detecting atrial fibrillation. Evid. Based Med.
13: 91-91
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
