DIAGNOSIS
Review: non-psychiatric physicians have low accuracy for recognising depression in their patients
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Dr M Cepoiu
Correspondence to: Dr M Cepoiu, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; monica.cepoiu@ucalgary.ca
QUESTION
How accurate are non-psychiatric physicians in recognising depression in their patients?
REVIEW SCOPE
Studies selected evaluated the accuracy of non-psychiatric physicians in recognising depression in adult patients who attended primary care facilities, emergency departments, or outpatient clinics, or were admitted to hospital. "Recognition" was ascertained directly by an explicit statement or rating of depression by the physician (physician diagnosis method) or indirectly by chart review indicating antidepressant medication prescription, referral to a mental health specialist, or identification of depressive symptoms (chart review method). The reference standard for depression was diagnosis by a psychiatrist or by research staff using a structured clinical interview or rating scale with a specified cutpoint. Outcomes were summary sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio.
REVIEW METHODS
Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, CINAHL, and PsycINFO (to 2006); and reference lists were searched for studies published in English or
University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
