DIAGNOSIS
Albumin:creatinine ratio using an automated analyser was accurate for diagnosing proteinuria in pregnancy
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
P M Kyle
Professor P M Kyle, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand; pippa.kyle@otago.ac.nz
STUDY QUESTION
In high-risk pregnant women, how accurate for diagnosing proteinuria are albumin:creatinine ratio (A/Cr) tested on-site using an automated analyser, protein:creatinine ratio (P/Cr) tested in the laboratory, and automated dipstick analysis used on-site compared with 24-hour urine collection?
STUDY DESIGN
prospective cohort study.
high-risk antenatal clinic in a university hospital in New Zealand.
140 pregnant women (10 women were included twice) at >20 gestational weeks (median 34 wk). The women provided a midstream urine specimen for automated dipstick analysis; those with a
1+ result for new-onset proteinuria were invited to participate (n = 100), along with a selection of women with a negative or trace proteinuria result (n = 50). Women with culture-positive urinary tract infection, proteinuric renal disease, or diabetes with an abnormal first-trimester A/Cr were excluded.
automated dipstick analysis done on-site (cutpoint 1+), A/Cr done on-site (5
BC Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
