Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Evidence-based medicine targets the individual patient, part 2: guides and tools for individual decision-making
  1. Dirk Bassler1,
  2. Jason W Busse2,
  3. Paul J Karanicolas3,
  4. Gordon H Guyatt2
  1. 1
    University Children’s Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  2. 2
    McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3
    University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Despite some suggestions to the contrary,1 2 evidence-based decision-making puts the individual patient on centre stage. In part 1 of this commentary,3 we first described the range of issues that clinicians should consider when applying randomised controlled trial (RCT) results to ensure appropriately individualised care (figure). Second, we have shown how clinicians can use results of prognostic studies and RCTs to determine each patient’s risk of the adverse events that treatment is designed to prevent, and thus each patient’s likely absolute benefit.3 In part 2 of this commentary we will describe additional evidence-based medicine (EBM) guides and tools that advance individual decision-making.

    1. GUIDES FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF SUBGROUP ANALYSES

    Even if the overall relative summary treatment effect reported in a clinical trial suggests benefit, there may be …

    View Full Text