Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Review: some evidence supports pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments of fibromyalgia syndrome

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

S Carville

Dr S Carville, King's College London, London, UK; serena.carville@kcl.ac.uk

QUESTION

What is the research evidence for the effectiveness of treatments for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS)?

REVIEW SCOPE

Included studies used the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for FMS. Studies of chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis were excluded unless results were analysed separately for FMS. Outcomes were pain (visual analogue scale), function (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire), and withdrawals for adverse effects.

REVIEW METHODS

Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and reference lists were searched for clinical trials. Studies could not be pooled; they were graded according to level of evidence—double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were the highest level. 146 clinical trials (59 on pharmacological treatments and 87 on non-pharmacological treatments) were included.

MAIN RESULTS

Non-pharmacological treatments. Heated pool treatment or balneotherapy, with (2 of 3 RCTs) and without (2 of 2 RCTs) exercise, was effective for pain and function. Evidence on aerobic exercise was …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Source of funding: EULAR.