QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
Physician training in the use of a decision aid increased patient participation in decision making for CVD prevention
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
T Krones
Dr T Krones, Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany; krones@med.uni-marburg.de
STUDY DESIGN
cluster randomised controlled trial.
{concealed}*.
blinded (patients).
STUDY QUESTION
14 continuing medical education (CME) groups in Hessen, Germany. CME groups were excluded if several members were already familiar with the ARRIBA-Herz decision aid or used another cardiovascular risk calculator.
1132 adult patients (mean age 59 y, 56% women) who had serum cholesterol concentrations measured during a 4-week period, regardless of cardiovascular disease (CVD) history.
two 2-hour CME sessions involving either training in the use of the ARRIBA-Herz decision aid (7 CME groups, 80 physicians, and 550 patients), or seminars on topics other than CVD prevention (7 CME groups, 82 physicians, and 582 patients). Use of the decision aid involved 6 steps: agree on the tasks of evaluating the patients risk of CVD and involving the patient in decision making; explore the patients perspective on CVD risk and prevention; calculate and
Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
