EVIDENTLY
Evidently...
Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford; Oxford, UK
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Like most primary care doctors, I have spent a working lifetime prescribing antibiotics for respiratory tract infections, knowing that in most cases they make no difference at all. Until now, a plausible excuse for such behaviour has been that we cannot reliably distinguish between viral and bacterial infection, but recently, procalcitonin has been suggested as a blood marker that does just that. But is it reliable, and will it really change doctor behaviour? A well-conducted trial from Switzerland (Arch Int Med 2008;168:2000–7) attempts to answer these questions in a real-life setting: 53 primary care physicians recruited 458 adult patients with respiratory tract infections that they thought might need an antibiotic. Patients were centrally randomised to be treated as usual or to have their therapy guided by blood procalcitonin measurements, with a turn-around time of 2–4 hours. The physicians who entered the study were already low antibiotic
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
