DIAGNOSIS
Clinical diagnosis of vaginitis was moderately accurate in symptomatic women
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
STUDY QUESTION
In women with vulvovaginal symptoms, how accurate is a clinical diagnosis of vaginitis?
STUDY DESIGN
blinded comparison of clinical diagnosis with DNA probe analysis.
4 US military medical clinics.
535 women 18–50 years of age (mean age 26 y) who presented with vulvovaginal symptoms (51% with abnormal discharge, 33% with itching/irritation, 10% with malodour, and 4% with vulvar burning). Women who were menstruating or had had coitus in <24 hours were excluded.
standard clinical diagnosis by a nurse practitioner consisting of history; physical examination; and pH determination, amines (whiff) test, and wet-prep microscopy of vaginal secretions.
DNA probe analysis on vaginal secretions for Gardnerella vaginalis, Trichomonas vaginalis, and candida species.
sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of clinical diagnosis for each of the 3 types of vaginitis.
MAIN RESULTS
By DNA probe analysis, 42% of women had bacterial vaginosis, 14% had candidiasis vaginitis, 1.5% had trichomoniasis vaginalis, 16% had
University of Missouri-Kansas City Kansas City, Missouri, USA
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
