Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A behavioural weight-loss programme was better than an education programme for urinary incontinence in overweight and obese women

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

STUDY DESIGN

Design:

randomised controlled trial (Program to Reduce Incontinence by Diet and Exercise [PRIDE]). ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00091988.

Allocation:

{concealed}*.†

Blinding:

blinded (outcome assessors).†

STUDY QUESTION

Setting:

Providence, Rhode Island, and Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Patients:

338 women ⩾30 years of age who had a body mass index (BMI) of 25–50 and ⩾10 urinary incontinence episodes/week, monitored food intake and physical activity for 1 week, and could walk unassisted for 2 blocks without stopping. Exclusion criteria included medical therapy for incontinence or weight loss in the past month, current urinary tract infection or ⩾4 in the past year, neurological or functional incontinence, urethral or incontinence surgery, major medical or genitourinary tract conditions, pregnancy or childbirth in the past 6 months, uncontrolled hypertension, and increased risk of hypoglycaemia from diabetes treatment.

Intervention:

6-month (1 h/wk) weight-loss programme (n = 226) or 4-month (1 h/mo) education programme …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Sources of funding: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Office of Research on Women's Health; Unilever.