OTHER
Diagnosis
Self-administered vaginal swabs were accurate for screening for sexually transmitted infections in the emergency department
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In female patients in the emergency department (ED), is screening for sexually transmitted infections using self-administered vaginal swabs (SAVS) as accurate as physician-assisted cervical swabs (PACS)?
prospective cohort study.
2 EDs (at a university-based tertiary care centre and a municipal academic level 1 trauma centre) serving a low-income community in Brooklyn, New York, USA.
162 sexually active women 18–55 years of age (mean age 32 y) who attended the ED, with or without genitourinary complaints, and consented to the collection of both types of sample.
self-collection of a vaginal swab for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Patients were given written instructions, and research assistants were available to answer questions.
cervical swab for PCR testing collected by the ED physician during pelvic examination.
sensitivity and specificity of SAVS compared with PACS.
The prevalence of C trachomatis was 6.8%. N gonorrhoeae was detected (by
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
