EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brosnahan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brosnahan, J.
Evidence-Based Medicine 2003; 8:24
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group


Therapeutics

Treatment of scalp lacerations with a hair apposition technique reduced scarring, pain, and procedure duration compared with suturing

Ong Eng Hock M, Ooi SB, Saw SM, et al.A randomized controlled trial comparing the hair apposition technique with tissue glue to standard suturing in scalp lacerations (HAT study).Ann Emerg Med 2002 ;40:19–26[Medline]

QUESTION: Is a new technique of treating scalp lacerations (the hair apposition technique [HAT]) as effective as standard suturing for wound healing, complications, and pain?

Key Words: scalp • lacerations • tissue adhesives • suture techniques

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Design
Randomised (allocation concealed*), unblinded,* controlled trial with follow up at 1 week.

Setting
The emergency departments (EDs) of 2 tertiary care hospitals in Singapore.

Patients
189 patients of any age (mean age 32 y, 74% men) with linear non-stellate lacerations of the scalp that were <10 cm in length and with scalp hair >3 cm in length. Exclusion criteria were severely contaminated wounds, actively bleeding wounds that did not stop bleeding after >=5 minutes of applied pressure, and unstable vital signs or neurological status requiring priority resuscitation. 188 patients (99%) were included in the analysis.

Intervention
96 patients were allocated to the HAT. Wounds were cleansed according to standard procedure, and no local anaesthetics were given. The wound was closed by bringing together the hair on both sides of the wound and making a single twist; no actual knot was made. The twist was then secured with tissue glue. Patients were instructed . . . [Full text of this article]

Jane Brosnahan, RCPN, BN

Centre for Evidence Based Nursing Aotearoa
Auckland District Health Board
Auckland, New Zealand







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.