EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yelland, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yelland, M.
Topic Collections
Right arrow EBM Diagnosis
Evidence-Based Medicine 2003; 8:26
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group


Diagnosis

Various history and physical examination characteristics predicted nerve root compression

Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JK, et al.Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of lumbosacral nerve root compression.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002 ;72:630–4[Abstract/Free Full Text]

QUESTION: In patients presenting to a primary care physician with a new episode of pain radiating into the leg, how accurate are history and physical examination characteristics for detecting nerve root compression?

Key Words: magnetic resonance imaging • medical history taking • physical examination

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Design
Blinded comparison of history and physical examination characteristics with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

Setting
Neurology department of a university hospital in Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Patients
274 patients (mean age 46 y, 51% men) with a new episode of pain radiating into the leg. Exclusion criteria were previous spinal surgery, pregnancy, severe comorbidity, or contraindication to MR imaging.

Description of test and diagnostic standard
Standardised methods were used to assess history and physical characteristics. The diagnostic standard was MR imaging of the lumbar spine within 24 hours after the clinical examination (including MR radiculography).

Main outcome measures
Independent history and physical examination predictors of nerve root compression on MR imaging using multiple logistic regression analysis, and predictive power of diagnostic models.

Main results
56% of MR imaging studies detected root compression. Several history items and physical examination tests independently predicted nerve root compression (tableGo). For a multivariate model including history and physical examination variables, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve . . . [Full text of this article]

Michael Yelland, MBBS

University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.