EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Read related BMJ news item
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laine, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Laine, L.
Evidence-Based Medicine 2003; 8:159
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.


Economics

Coxibs were not cost effective for arthritis pain in patients with average risk of ulcer complications

Spiegel BM, Targownik L, Dulai GS, et al.The cost-effectiveness of cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors in the management of chronic arthritis.Ann Intern Med 2003;138:795–806[Abstract/Free Full Text]

QUESTION: In patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, does the reduction in gastrointestinal (GI) complications seen with coxibs offset their increased cost compared with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)?

Key Words: arthritis (rheumatoid) • osteoarthritis • peptic ulcer • cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors • anti-inflammatory agents (non-steroidal)

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Design
Cost utility analysis using a decision analytic model from the perspective of a third party payer considering direct medical costs.

Setting
USA.

Patients
A hypothetical cohort of patients 60 years of age with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis who were not taking aspirin and required NSAID therapy for moderate to severe arthritis pain.

Intervention
Patients who entered the model were treated with a coxib (celecoxib, 200 mg once daily, or rofecoxib, 25 mg once daily) or a non-selective NSAID at the maximum dose approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (naproxen, 500 mg twice daily). The model was designed to test the hypothesis that coxibs are cost effective alternatives to NSAIDs.

Main cost and outcome measures
A decision tree was constructed to represent the coxib and naproxen strategies. Clinical probability estimates were derived from a systematic review of the literature using Medline and hand searching 2 subspecialty journals (January 1985 to December 2002). Validated utilities were assigned for . . . [Full text of this article]

Loren Laine, MD

University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, USA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.