Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Evidence-Based Medicine 2004;9:60; doi:10.1136/ebm.9.2.60
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Evidence-Based Medicine 2004; 9:60
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Quality improvement

Review: interventions focusing on patient behaviours in provider patient interactions improve diabetes outcomes

van Dam HA, van der Horst F, van den Borne B, et al. Provider-patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patient self-care and outcomes. A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2003;51:17–28.[CrossRef][Medline]

Q In patients with diabetes, do experimental modifications of provider patient interactions improve patient behaviours and health outcomes?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care *****{star}{star} IM/Ambulatory care ****{star}{star}{star} Endocrine *****{star}{star}

Key Words: patient centred care • physician-patient relations • diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS

Data sources: 4 electronic databases and the bibliographies of retrieved studies.

Study selection and assessment: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental studies of modifications of provider patient interaction, provider consulting style, or patient education in patients with type 2 diabetes that assessed effects on diabetes outcomes. Study quality was assessed (maximum score 19 points).

Outcomes: patient behaviours (participation in care, adherence to professional advice, self care, self monitoring of blood glucose, insulin or other medication use, exercise, diet, and other lifestyle modifications); patient biomedical issues (glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, complications, hospital admission, and mortality); patient functional measures (physical, emotional, social, and professional); psychological measures (satisfaction, well being, depression, anxiety, mental health, and quality of life); provider adherence to guidelines; and provider behaviour, satisfaction, and attitudes.

MAIN RESULTS

8 RCTs (4 on provider behaviour, 4 on patient behaviour) met the selection criteria. The quality score ranged from 13 to 19 points (mean . . . [Full text of this article]

Victor M Montori, MD, MSc

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Rochester, Minnesota, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.