EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edmonds, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edmonds, M.
Topic Collections
Right arrow EBM Diagnosis
Evidence-Based Medicine 2004; 9:120
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.


Diagnosis

Review: inflammatory response variables, descriptors of peritoneal irritation, and migration of pain are most discriminatory of appendicitis

Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg 2004;91:28–37.[CrossRef][Medline]

Q In adult patients admitted to hospital with suspected appendicitis, what is the diagnostic value of elements of disease history, clinical findings, and laboratory test results?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ******{star} IM/Ambulatory care *****{star}{star} Internal Medicine *****{star}{star} Emergency medicine *****{star}{star}

Key Words: appendicitis • laboratory techniques and procedures

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
Data sources: Medline (to June 1, 2003), bibliographies of relevant studies, and personal files.

Study selection and assessment: published studies on the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis in patients admitted to hospital with suspected appendicitis. Results had to be presented so that likelihood ratios and areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve could be calculated. Studies of children, patients with abdominal pain, patients having surgery, or comparisons of patients with verified appendicitis and healthy persons were not eligible.

Outcomes: ROC areas, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were used to describe the diagnostic performance of variables for diagnosing appendicitis.

MAIN RESULTS
24 studies (5833 patients) met the selection criteria, which described 28 diagnostic variables for diagnosing appendicitis in patients with suspected appendicitis. The proportion of patients with a diagnosis of appendicitis ranged from 27–61% (median 41%). In 23 studies, the diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological examination. Certain variables, including inflammatory . . . [Full text of this article]

Marcia Edmonds, MD

University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.