EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fanning, M. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fanning, M. M
Evidence-Based Medicine 2004; 9:150
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.


Therapeutics

Review: artesunate added to standard drug treatment reduces treatment failure in malaria

International Artemisinin Study Group. Artesunate combinations for treatment of malaria: meta-analysis. Lancet 2004;363:9–17.[CrossRef][Medline]

Q In patients with acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, does the addition of an artemisinin derivative (artesunate) to existing drug treatment reduce treatment failure and transmission potential?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ******{star} Infectious disease *****{star}{star} Tropical medicine ******{star}

Key Words: artemisinins • antimalarials • malaria (falciparum)

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
{ebmcmptrbooks.f1}Data sources: Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and investigators in the field. Individual patient data were requested from the original trial datasets.

{ebmmgnfyglas.f1}Study selection and assessment: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing artesunate plus a standard antimalarial drug with a standard drug alone for acute, uncomplicated P falciparum malaria. Study quality was assessed by adequacy of random allocation, inclusion of all eligible patients in the analysis, and completeness of follow up.

{ebmruler.f1}Outcomes: treatment failure rates at 14 and 28 days.

MAIN RESULTS
16 trials met the selection criteria (n = 5948). The background drugs used were chloroquine (3 RCTs done in Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Sao Tome and Principe), amodiaquine (3 RCTs done in Gabon, Kenya, and Senegal), sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (7 RCTs done in Gambia, Kenya, Malawi, Peru, and Uganda), and mefloquine (3 RCTs done in Thailand). 12 RCTs were placebo controlled. All but 1 RCT assessed 3 days of artesunate. . . . [Full text of this article]

Mary M Fanning, MD, PhD

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland, USA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.