EBM

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marks, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marks, R.
Evidence-Based Medicine 2004; 9:183
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.


Therapeutics

Primary tumour excision with a surrounding margin of 3 cm reduced recurrence in melanomas > 2 mm thick

Thomas JM, Newton-Bishop J, A’Hern R, et al. Excision margins in high-risk malignant melanoma. N Engl J Med 2004;350:757–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Q In patients with high risk malignant melanoma, is primary tumour excision with a surrounding margin of 3 cm more effective than a margin of 1 cm for reducing recurrence and improving survival?

Clinical impact ratings Dermatology ******{star} Oncology ******{star} Surgery ****{star}{star}{star}

Key Words: melanoma • skin neoplams

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

METHODS
{ebmflochart.f1}Design: randomised controlled trial.

{ebmclsdenvelop.f1}Allocation: concealed.*

{ebmhalfeye.f1}Blinding: blinded (monitoring committee).*

{ebmhourglass.f1}Follow up period: a median of 60 months.

{ebmglobe.f1}Setting: 21 hospitals, 2 infirmaries, 1 cancer therapy network in the UK, and 1 cancer centre in Poland.

{ebmpatient.f1}Patients: 900 patients >18 years of age (mean age 57 y, 52% men) who had a single primary localised cutaneous melanoma (>=2 mm in thickness) on the trunk or limbs (excluding the palms of hands or the soles of the feet) where a 3 cm excision margin was technically possible. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, a history of cancer (except basal cell carcinoma), and treatment with immunosuppressive agents.

{ebmrx.f1}Intervention: primary tumour excision with a total surrounding margin of 1 cm (n = 453) or 3 cm (n = 447). All excisions were extended to or included the deep fascia.

{ebmruler.f1}Outcomes: incidence of local, in transit, or nodal tumour recurrence and a composite endpoint comprising . . . [Full text of this article]

Robin Marks, MBBS, MPH, MRACP, FACD, FRACP

St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.