| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
THERAPEUTICS |
In elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care, is warfarin more effective than aspirin for preventing major stroke, arterial embolism, and intracranial haemorrhage?
Mant J, Hobbs FDR, Fletcher K, et al. Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;370:493–503.
Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care 
Geriatrics Cardiology Haematology Neurology
 |
METHODS |
|---|
 TOP METHODS MAIN RESULTSCONCLUSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Design:
Blinding:
blinded (outcome assessors).*
Follow-up period:
mean 2.7 years.
Setting:
234 general practices in England and Wales.
Patients:
973 patients 
75 years of age (mean age 81y, 55% men) with AF or flutter within the past 2 years (confirmed by electrocardiography). Exclusion criteria included terminal illness, rheumatic heart disease, major non-traumatic haemorrhage within 5 years, intracranial haemorrhage, peptic ulcer in previous year, oesophageal varices, warfarin or aspirin allergy, surgery in previous 3 months, BP >180/110 mm Hg, or belief of the primary care physician that 1 of the study medications is more appropriate for the patient.
Intervention:
warfarin (n = 488) with a target international normalised ratio (INR) of 2.5 (acceptable range 2–3), evaluated according to individual general practice routine, or aspirin, 75 mg/day (n = 485). Current treatment with warfarin or aspirin was stopped if patients were randomised to the opposite treatment.
Outcomes:
fatal or non-fatal disabling stroke, intracranial haemorrhage (confirmed by brain imaging), or significant arterial embolism (confirmed by vascular imaging, scintigraphy, surgery, or autopsy). Secondary outcomes included other major haemorrhage, other vascular events requiring hospital admission or resulting in death, and all-cause mortality.
Patient follow-up:
965 patients (99%) (intention-to-treat analysis).
|
MAIN RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPMETHODSMAIN RESULTSCONCLUSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
TOPMETHODSMAIN RESULTSCONCLUSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
75 years of age with atrial fibrillation in primary care, warfarin was more effective than aspirin for reducing major stroke. Abstract and commentary also appear in ACP Journal Club.
|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Source of funding: Medical Research Council (MRC).
Leonard M Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
In elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care, is warfarin more effective than aspirin for preventing major stroke, arterial embolism, and intracranial haemorrhage?
AF is the most common arrhythmia in the elderly and is a strong independent risk factor for stroke. Warfarin remains underutilised in the elderly despite the fact that age independently predicts stroke risk in AF.1 A recent meta-analysis of adjusted dose warfarin compared with placebo in AF showed a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 64% and absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 2.7%/year for stroke with warfarin.2 In the same meta-analysis, adjusted dose warfarin compared with antiplatelet therapy had an RRR of 37% and an ARR of 0.9%/year. Absolute increases in major extracranial haemorrhage with warfarin were small (about 0.3%/y). A limitation of prior randomised trials has been the under-representation of the elderly. The BAFTA study is a step forward in helping to convince clinicians that warfarin dosed to a target INR of 2.5 in the elderly is more effective in preventing stroke and systemic embolism than aspirin. Although the study was not powered to detect a difference in major bleeding, a low rate of such bleeding in both groups is somewhat reassuring.
Study features that make the results more generalisable to the elderly include enrolment from primary care practices, mean age of 81 years, CHADS2 score of 1 or 23 in >70% of patients, blinded outcome assessment, and a fair amount of crossover between groups. The aspect that makes this study less generalisable is that >50% of the patients were managed by hospital run anticoagulation clinics, which are better than individual doctors in managing INR and, therefore, may be a reason for the high rate of therapeutic INRs and the low rate of bleeding.
The BAFTA study results would support adjusted dose warfarin with a target INR of 2.5 (range 2–3) for all patients 75 years with AF in the absence of contraindications. This recommendation is more liberal than the current referenced guidelines.1 3 4
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPMETHODSMAIN RESULTSCONCLUSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
Allocation: