Article Text

PDF

Review: fluoxetine, orlistat, and sibutramine modestly reduce weight in type 2 diabetes
  1. Christopher D Byrne, FRCP, FRCPath, PhD1,
  2. Sarah Wild, MRCP, MRCGP, MFPHM, PhD2
  1. 1Southampton General Hospital
 Southampton, UK
  2. 2University of Edinburgh
 Edinburgh, UK

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    
 
 Q In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, what is the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for weight loss?

    Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★☆☆ IM/Ambulatory care ★★★★★☆☆ Endocrine ★★★★★☆☆

    METHODS

    Embedded ImageData sources:

    Medline (1966 to September 2002), EMBASE/Excerpta Medica (1974 to September 2002), CINAHL (1982 to September 2002), Web of Science (1981 to September 2002), Biosis (1970 to September 2002), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to September 2002), Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2002), Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2002), key journals, bibliographies of relevant studies, and contact with experts and drug manufacturers.

    Embedded ImageStudy selection and assessment:

    published and unpublished studies that used pharmacotherapy as the primary strategy for weight loss in adults with type 2 diabetes and had weight as an outcome. The drugs evaluated were centrally acting appetite suppressants, drugs with a peripheral effect on appetite, drugs that affect nutrient partitioning, and drugs that increase thermogenesis. Drugs withdrawn from the US market or unavailable in the US, investigational drugs and dietary supplements, and metformin and acarbose were excluded. Studies were assessed for quality.

    Embedded ImageOutcomes:

    changes in weight and glycated haemoglobin concentrations.

    MAIN RESULTS

    59 studies met the inclusion criteria. 14 randomised placebo controlled trials (n = 2231) had sufficient data for meta-analysis: 6 of fluoxetine (n = 296, mean age 55 y, 51% women, follow up 8–52 wks), 4 of orlistat (n = 1475, mean age 55 y, 52% women, follow up 52–57 wks), and 4 of sibutramine (n = 460, mean age 53 y, 59% women; follow up 12–26 wks). Fluoxetine, orlistat, and sibutramine led to modest reductions in weight; and fluoxetine and orlistat led to modest reductions in glycated haemoglobin (table).

    Pharmacotherapy for weight reduction in type 2 diabetes*

    CONCLUSION

    In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, fluoxetine, orlistat, and sibutramine modestly reduce weight and fluoxetine and orlistat improve blood sugar control.

    Abstract and commentary also appear in ACP Journal Club.

    Commentary

    Padwal et al have systematically reviewed the effectiveness and safety of approved anti-obesity medications in clinical trials that lasted for ⩾1 year for which the results were available by the end of 2002. Norris et al have done a meta-analysis of studies reported before September 2002 that examined the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for weight loss over 8–57 weeks in adults with type 2 diabetes. Norris et al also report the limited data describing the effects of fluoxetine. More research is needed before the clinical usefulness of this agent can be established. The authors of both reviews conclude that available licensed therapies (eg, sibutramine and orlistat) help induce weight loss. Although of shorter duration, trials of sibutramine suggest that the magnitude of weight reduction is similar to that seen with orlistat.

    A number of important questions need to be addressed before advocating widespread use of pharmacological treatments for weight reduction. Norris et al attempted to obtain results of unpublished studies of weight loss treatments but were unable to identify whether publication bias had occurred. It is difficult to infer whether some patients might respond better to certain weight loss therapies because sampling frames, the method of recruitment, and selection of participants were rarely described. Attrition is an important issue in weight loss studies because patients who do not achieve their goal weight often do not return for follow up.

    The safety of pharmacological interventions also needs to be considered. Orlistat treatment has been associated with lower concentrations of fat soluble vitamins in plasma. Sibutramine is a similar compound to dexfenfluramine, which has been associated with pulmonary hypertension and valvular heart disease. In the studies reviewed, these serious side effects were not identified. Common side effects were dry mouth, constipation, and insomnia and more rarely palpitations and increased blood pressure. However, sibutramine is contraindicated in people with coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, stroke, or inadequately controlled hypertension or those receiving psychiatric medications. These restrictions limit its usefulness in clinical practice.

    Both orlistat and sibutramine are associated with improved cardiovascular risk factors. However, it is not known whether treatment with these agents reduces risk of cardiovascular events. Since the work of Padwal et al and Norris et al, 1 other important study in this field has been published. A 4 year, double blind, randomised, prospective trial of 3305 people with BMI ⩾30 kg/m2 who were randomised to lifestyle intervention plus either orlistat, 120 mg 3 times daily, or placebo showed that orlistat treatment combined with lifestyle changes reduced incident diabetes by 37%.1 It is uncertain if treatment with drugs, such as orlistat or sibutramine, is associated with weight cycling, which appears to adversely affect cardiovascular risk factors.

    Commentary continued on next page.

    Although orlistat and sibutramine undoubtedly produce weight loss, the effect is modest and is less than can be achieved with intensive lifestyle interventions. Combining increased physical activity and calorie restriction has been shown to reduce the risk of incident diabetes by as much as 58% in 2 similar studies.2,3 Lifestyle interventions have been poorly studied but are the preferred treatment option for most individuals, although many persons who are overweight or obese are unable to undertake or adhere to intensive lifestyle interventions, especially over the longer term. Until effective methods of obesity prevention are introduced, a role for pharmacological treatment of obesity remains. Further research is required to establish cost effectiveness and to identify subgroups of patients who are most likely to benefit from different approaches to weight loss.

    References

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • For correspondence: Dr S L Norris, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. scn5{at}cdc.gov

    • Source of funding: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.