Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Review: delayed pushing reduces rotational or mid pelvic instrumental deliveries but increases duration of the second stage of labour in women having epidural analgesia

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


 
 Q In women with uncomplicated pregnancies having effective epidural analgesia in the first stage of labour, what is the effectiveness of delayed compared with early pushing?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Obstetrics ★★★★★★☆ Obstetrics ★★★★★★☆

METHODS

Embedded ImageData sources:

Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica (all from inception to October 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (searched October 2003), and bibliographies of relevant papers.

Embedded ImageStudy selection and assessment:

randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of delayed versus early pushing in women having effective epidural analgesia in the first stage of labour and an uncomplicated pregnancy. Studies were assessed for allocation concealment, losses to follow up, and intention to treat analysis.

Embedded ImageOutcomes:

instrumental deliveries, and maternal and infant morbidity.

MAIN RESULTS

9 trials (2953 women) met the selection criteria. All trials included women at term with spontaneous …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • For correspondence: Dr C L Roberts, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. christine.robertsperinatal.usyd.edu.au

  • Source of funding: National Health and Medicine Research Council.