Article Text

PDF
Randomised controlled trial
Catheter ablation treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation results in a longer time to treatment failure than anti-arrhythmic drugs and improves quality of life
  1. Nassir F Marrouche
  1. Correspondence to Nassir F Marrouche
    Division of Cardiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, Room 4A100 Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; nassir.marrouche{at}hsc.utah.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Commentary on:

Ablation of atrial fibrillation: the road to primary treatment option

Currently, more than 2.3 million people in North America and 4.5 million in the European Union have atrial fibrillation (AF), making it the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice.1 2 It is expected that by 2050, there will be more than 10 million people with AF.3 Catheter ablation has emerged as a viable treatment option for AF. Despite the fact that less than 1% of the AF population is offered catheter-based treatment in the USA and Europe, results from prospective randomized studies remain the major hurdle facing the implementation of catheter ablation as a primary treatment option for patients with AF.

Wilber and colleagues recently published a prospective, multicentre, randomized study comparing catheter ablation and anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) for treatment of patients with paroxysmal AF who have previously failed at least one AAD therapy. Patients included in the study had to have at least 3 symptomatic AF episodes within the 6 months prior to randomization and did not respond to …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.