Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Systematic review
Currently available smartphone apps for asthma have worrying deficiencies
  1. Brian McKinstry
  1. Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to : Professor Brian McKinstry
    Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK; Brian.McKinstry{at}ed.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed.

Context

Long-term conditions are becoming more prevalent1 and self-management is increasingly advocated by health services as a means of addressing this problem.2 Mobile app designers have enthusiastically embraced the healthcare market by designing hundreds of health-related apps targeted at long-term condition management. However, in the absence of any regulatory body overseeing the content and quality of these apps, their suitability for self-management is unknown. Huckvale and colleagues sought to explore the content of readily available apps in asthma, a condition known to be improved by the use of self-management plans.

Methods

The authors adopted rigorous systematic review methodology to carry out the assessment. They sought asthma-related apps on app stores …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.