Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Randomised controlled trial
Short-course antimicrobial therapy may be clinically similar to a longer course for complicated intra-abdominal infections
  1. Tanya L Zakrison
  1. Department of Surgery, Ryder Trauma Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
  1. Correspondence to : Dr Tanya L Zakrison, Department of Surgery, Ryder Trauma Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1800 NW 10th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA; tzakrison{at}med.miami.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed.

Context

The prevention and treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections have remained a priority for surgeons for decades, importantly including adequate source control.1 While evidence supports the early initiation of antimicrobial therapy,2 questions remain about the appropriate extent of therapy. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)-related signs of sepsis have dictated duration. However, signs of SIRS may persist without any evidence of infection. The corollary is also true as up to 12.5% of patients with severe sepsis may indeed be SIRS negative.3 Sawyer and colleagues previously demonstrated that a fixed duration of antimicrobial therapy yielded similar outcomes with less antibiotic use.4 Clinicians have historically treated complicated intra-abdominal infections for up to 14 days, although practice guidelines recommend 4–7 days. …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter Follow Tanya L Zakrison at @tzakrison

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.