Article Text

PDF

Review: β-agonists plus ipratropium bromide improve airflow obstruction in adults with acute asthma
  1. Brian H Rowe, MD, MSc
  1. University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    
 
 QUESTION: Is the addition of inhaled ipratropium bromide to β-agonist therapy effective in the emergency treatment of adults with acute asthma?

    Data sources

    Studies were identified by searching Medline (1966 to January 1997), EMBASE/Excerpta Medica (1980–97), CINAHL (1982 to 1997), Biological Abstracts on CD (1990 to 1997), the Cochrane Library, Current Contents (1996 to August 1997), and bibliographies of relevant papers and by contacting the manufacturer of ipratropium.

    Study selection

    Published and unpublished studies in English, French, and Italian were selected if they were randomised, placebo-controlled trials that assessed the use of ipratropium in addition to β-agonists (administered by inhaler or wet nebuliser) compared with β-agonist therapy alone in adult patients with acute asthma presenting to a hospital emergency department (ED) or similar acute care setting. Exclusion criteria were patients <18 years old or studies of patients who had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease alone.

    Data extraction

    Trial design and methodological quality; drug treatments, dosages, and time intervals; patient characteristics; mean percentage change from baseline in FEV1 or peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR); hospitalisation rate; and adverse effects.

    Main results

    10 studies (1377 patients, age range 30–53 y) met the selection criteria. Meta-analysis showed a greater improvement with β-agonists plus ipratropium bromide than with β-agonists alone: improvement in FEV1 was 7.3% (95% CI 3.8% to 10.9%), or 100 ml (CI 50 to 149 ml), at assessment times ranging between 45 and 90 minutes (5 studies); improvement in PEFR was 22.1% (CI 11.0% to 33.2%), or 32 l/min (CI 16 to 47 l/min), at assessment times ranging between 30 and 60 minutes (5 studies). In 3 studies (1064 patients), β-agonists plus ipratropium bromide reduced the rate of admission to hospital {11% v 15%, p=0.04}* more than β-agonists alone. Neither combination therapy nor monotherapy was associated with adverse effects.

    Conclusion

    Ipratropium bromide added to β-agonist therapy improves airflow obstruction better than β-agonists alone in the emergency treatment of adults with acute asthma.

    Commentary

    In the United States, 2 million ED visits for acute asthma occur annually,1 and the healthcare costs associated with this disease are enormous.2 Guidelines for acute asthma care have been developed, and treatments that improve outcomes in patients with acute asthma are an important contribution to health care.

    Treatment involves the early use of inhaled β2-agonists. Systemic corticosteroid therapy is also recommended early in ED care.3 Both of these treatments are consistently used in North American EDs. However, the use of anticholinergic agents, such as ipratropium bromide, is rather limited. This reflects, in part, conflicting evidence in the published literature regarding efficacy.

    By reducing the biases common to systematic reviews, Stoodley and colleagues have provided high-quality evidence that shows a beneficial effect of adding ipratropium bromide to inhaled β2-agonists in adult patients with acute asthma. Using accepted methods, the reviewers have shown improvements in pulmonary function; the effect appears greatest in patients with more severe asthma. Although the clinical significance of these effects is debated in the review, it would be considered important in cases of severe airway obstruction. Moreover, the evidence suggests that ipratropium bromide is beneficial in reducing the hospitalisation rate. In summary, although questions still need to be resolved about ipratropium bromide therapy in the ED setting (such as the dose-response relation), it seems prudent to use this agent in combination with β2-agonists for patients with severe acute asthma to improve pulmonary function and reduce admissions to hospital.

    References

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • Source of funding: no external funding.

    • For correspondence: Dr S D Aaron, Ottawa General Hospital, Room LM-17, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada. FAX 613-737-8141.

    • * Data provided by author.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.