Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Practice based education did not increase recognition of depression by primary care physicians nor improve the outcome of depression

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


 
 QUESTION: In primary care, is an education programme based on a clinical practice guideline effective in improving the recognition and outcome of depression?

Design

Cluster randomised (allocation concealed*), unblinded,* controlled trial with 6 month follow up.

Setting

59 primary care practices in a health district in England, UK.

Patients

21 409 patients attending the clinics of 152 physicians were screened. Exclusion criteria were being <16 years of age or too unwell to complete the questionnaire.

Intervention

29 practices (3 withdrew leaving 26 practices with 64 physicians) were allocated to the education group, and 30 (1 was excluded leaving 29 practices with 88 physicians) were allocated to the control group. Education using a clinical practice guideline (tricyclic antidepressants recommended as first line treatment and physicians advised to aim for a dose of 150 mg) was provided in 2 parts by a team. Part 1 consisted of 4 hours of seminars, in groups of up to 20, at the beginning of …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Sources of funding: Medical Research Council; South and West Research and Development Directorate; Southampton Community Health Services Trust.

  • For correspondence: Professor C Thompson, Community Clinical Sciences Research Division, Department of Mental Health, University of Southampton, Royal South Hants Hospital, Brinton's Terrace, Southampton SO14 0PE, UK. Fax +44 (0)2380 234243.

  • Abstract and commentary also appear in Evidence-Based Mental Health.

  • * See glossary.