Article Text

PDF

Voluntary counselling and testing reduced unprotected intercourse among adults in 3 developing countries
  1. Edward A Lichter, MD
  1. University of Illinois College of Medicine Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    
 
 QUESTION: In adults in developing countries, is a voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) programme as effective as a health information programme in reducing risk behaviour associated with sexual transmission of HIV-1?

    Design

    Randomised (allocation concealment unclear*), unblinded,* controlled trial with mean 14 months follow up.

    Setting

    Nairobi, Kenya; Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; and Port of Spain, Trinidad.

    Participants

    4293 participants (3120 as individuals and 1173 as couples) who were ≥18 years of age (mean age 29 y) and were not known to be infected with HIV-1. First follow up data at a mean of 7.3 months were available for 2550 participants as individuals (82%) and for 1001 as couples (85%).

    Intervention

    Participants were stratified by site, sex, and couple or individual status and allocated to VCT (n=1563, 589 as couples) or health information (n=1557, 584 as couples). VCT involved personalised risk assessment, development of a plan for risk reduction with a counsellor, and ELISA testing of serum samples for HIV-1. The control intervention involved watching a 15 minute video and participating in a group discussion led by a health information officer about HIV-1 transmission and condom use. Participants in both groups received 25 condoms and a brochure showing correct condom use and could return any time for more condoms. All participants engaged in a baseline interview to assess HIV-1 risk behaviour.

    Main outcome measure

    Rate of unprotected intercourse assessed during follow up interviews.

    Main results

    Between baseline and the first follow up, rates of unprotected intercourse with non-primary partners decreased more in participants who received VCT than in those who received the health information control intervention (for men: relative rate reduction 35% v 13%, p=0.01; for women: relative rate reduction 39% v 17%, p=0.009). Among couples, men in the VCT group reported a greater reduction in rates of unprotected intercourse with enrolment partners than men in the control group (relative rate reduction 25% v 15%, p=0.008), but rates of unprotected intercourse with non-enrolment partners were not reduced. Rates of unprotected intercourse with non-primary partners decreased more in HIV infected men than in uninfected men; among HIV infected women, rates with primary partners decreased.

    Conclusion

    In adults in developing countries, a voluntary counselling and testing programme was more effective than a health information programme in reducing risk behaviour associated with sexual transmission of HIV-1 at a mean of 7.3 months of follow up.

    Commentary

    In the absence of a suitable vaccine for HIV control, attempts to alter and thus reduce high risk behaviour remain a primary effort for physicians and patients. The study by the Voluntary HIV-1 Counseling and Testing Efficacy Study Group selected patients from 3 developing countries to test whether counselling and free condoms reduce rates of infection more than standard health information dissemination. Data are dependent on patient recall of unprotected sex (non-condom) and follow up serological findings for case confirmation.

    Although rate reductions of unprotected intercourse with VCT seem reasonable, the nature of HIV-1 infection means that this intervention could only be expected to make a small contribution to the efforts to control or eliminate the disease in a community. Even if no errors occurred in the data recall set or during sampling or date recording, the failure to affect the sexual behaviour practices of ≥60% of people suggests that with a reservoir of HIV infection in the community the rates of infection are unlikely to differ after 1 year. This would be especially true if free condoms were no longer available and the counselling services were stopped. The study sample size is large, but it pales when compared with total populations at risk in developing countries, where most estimates of current prevalence range from about 1% to 13% but are higher in some countries.1 These rates will increase as illicit drug use becomes more prevalent and as economic and cultural development ensues.

    Individual physicians may take comfort in risk reductions in some of their patients as a result of the counselling techniques described here, but they must be prepared for longer term follow up, the inevitable failures to reduce incidence, and the consequences of condom cost and use. This study is commendable for its methods and data analysis, but attrition rate and behavioural change failure rate detract from its effectiveness. Such community based programmes may continue to be used, however, pending an effective vaccine and vaccination programme.

    References

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • Sources of funding: US Agency for International Development; World Health Organisation; United Nations Programme on AIDS; National Institute of Mental Health.

    • For correspondence: Dr T J Coates, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, 74 New Montgomery #600, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA. Fax +1 415 597 9213.

    • * See glossary.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.