Article Text

PDF

Ventilation tubes did not improve quality of life in persistent otitis media with effusion
  1. Michael B Aldous, MD, MPH
  1. University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, Arizona, USA

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    
 
 QUESTION: In young children with persistent otitis media with effusion (OME), is treatment with ventilation tubes more effective than a period of watchful waiting for improving quality of life?

    Design

    Randomised {allocation concealed*}, unblinded,* controlled trial with 12 months of follow up.

    Setting

    13 hospitals in the Netherlands.

    Patients

    206 children who had persistent OME confirmed by tympanometry and otoscopy. 19 children (9.2%) withdrew from the trial immediately after randomisation, leaving 187 children (mean age 19 mo) in the study sample. 176 children (85%) completed follow up.

    Intervention

    Patients were allocated to ventilation tubes (n=93) or watchful waiting (n=94).

    Main outcome measures

    Quality of life was measured using the TNO-AZL Infant Quality of Life questionnaire (TAIQOL) (46 items covering 13 domains; 9 domains were used in the analysis). Parent-child interaction was measured by using the Erickson scales, which include 5 child scales (affection, avoidance, compliance, negativism, and reliance) and 5 parent scales (supportive presence, respect, structure and limits, instruction, and hostility).

    Main results

    The study had power to detect a difference of 0.5 on a 12 point scale in improvement on the TAIQOL questionnaire between groups. At 12 months, quality of life improved in 6 domains (vitality, communication, motoric, social, eating, and sleeping) and deteriorated in 3 domains (appetite, anxiety, and aggression). The ventilation tube group showed no greater improvement or less deterioration than the watchful waiting group in any of the domains. A multivariate analysis of variance was done to detect evidence of a treatment effect for all domains combined and showed no difference between groups at 6 months (p=0.22) or 12 months (p=0.94). The groups did not differ for Erickson scores between baseline and 12 months. No treatment effect was seen for all domains combined for the child scales at 6 months (p=0.19) or 12 months (p=0.38) or for the parent scales (p=0.21 and p=0.95, respectively).

    Conclusion

    In young children with persistent otitis media with effusion detected by screening, treatment with ventilation tubes did not improve quality of life more than watchful waiting.

    Commentary

    Recent randomised trials using the same patient sample as that of the study by Rovers et al and another cohort suggest that early placement of ventilation tubes offers no advantage in language and other developmental outcomes in young children.1, 2 In the current study, Rovers et al report no effect of tubes on quality of life, yet other studies document a high rate of parental satisfaction with tube placement.3, 4

    A challenge of quality of life research is selection of the right measurement tool. Generic instruments like those used here are good for comparisons of different diseases, but for longitudinal changes in a given health condition, a disease specific measure may be more responsive.5

    A multicentre before and after trial using the OM-6, a reliable and responsive quality of life measure of otitis media specific symptoms, showed a large improvement in such symptoms after tube placement.6 These results warrant a well designed randomised trial using the OM-6 before we conclude that ventilation tubes have no beneficial effect on quality of life.

    References

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • Source of funding: Dutch Investigative Medicine Fund of the National Health Insurance Board.

    • For correspondence: Dr M M Rovers, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands. m.rovers{at}mie.kun.nl.

    • * See glossary.

    • Information provided by author.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.