Article Text

PDF

Direct observation of tuberculosis treatment did not promote higher cure rates than self administered treatment
  1. Manjula Datta, MD, Dch, MSc
  1. Tamil Nadu Dr M G R Medical University Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    
 
 QUESTION: In Pakistani patients with tuberculosis, what is the effectiveness of the directly observed treatment, short-course (DOTS) strategy by a health worker or family member?

    Design

    8 month randomised {allocation concealed*}, blinded (clinicians and outcome assessors),* controlled trial.

    Setting

    3 tuberculosis treatment centres in Pakistan.

    Patients

    497 patients who were ≥15 years of age (42% were 15 to 24 y, 22% were 25 to 34 y; 51% men) and were newly diagnosed with sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis, had not previously received tuberculosis treatment, and lived in the catchment area. Follow up was complete.

    Intervention

    Patients were allocated to 1 of 3 treatments: self administered treatment, in which patients received tuberculosis drugs every 2 weeks from the closest health facility (n=162); health worker DOTS, involving a 2 month intensive phase during which a health worker supervised the treatment and a 6 month continuation phase during which patients received self administered treatment (n=170); or family member DOTS, involving collection of the drugs by a chosen family member (n=165). All patients received 2 months of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol and 6 months of isoniazid and ethambutol.

    Main outcome measures

    Cure rate (sputum negative test result at 7 or 8 mo and on ≥1 previous occasion) and treatment completion rates.

    Main results

    Analysis was by intention to treat. The study had 90% power to detect a 20% difference in cure rates between groups. The cure rates for the self administered treatment group did not differ from the health worker observed group (p=0.73) or from the family member observed group (p=0.23) (table). No differences existed for the combination of cure and treatment completion rates (p=0.75 and p=0.65, respectively). More women than men were cured (71% v 50%, p<0.001).

    Self administered treatment v directly observed treatment, short course (DOTS) by health worker or family member for tuberculosis at 8 months‡

    Conclusions

    In Pakistani patients with tuberculosis, no differences in cure or cure and completion rates were seen among 3 tuberculosis treatment approaches. Directly observed treatment by health workers or family members was not more effective than self administered treatment.

    Commentary

    By declaring tuberculosis a global emergency in 1993, the World Health Organisation (WHO) helped to focus attention on the disease and championed the aggressive introduction of the DOTS strategy, which has been hailed as the breakthrough of the century in the fight against tuberculosis. It involves increased commitment by central and state governments, effective diagnosis based on sputum microscopy, standard short course treatment given under direct observation, a secure drug supply, and systematic monitoring and evaluation.1

    After successes in Tanzania in 1977, when cure rates rose from 43% in 1983 to 90% in 1990, the DOTS strategy was used in several other countries, which resulted in high cure rates. A systematic review done by the South African Cochrane Centre found that the success of DOTS programmes might be the result of several components beyond the 5 elements of the WHO's DOTS programme,2 such as the use of education and motivation programmes, incentives, home visits, legal sanctions, and additional external funds.

    The study by Walley et al seems to confirm that a focus on direct observation as a key factor may be inappropriate. As suggested by the study, dose supervision may be made more user friendly. As it stands, a patient must make 40 visits during 6 months, sometimes travelling up to 5 kilometres a day. The sustainability of such a system is questionable.

    Several factors might account for the success of the DOTS programmes. It is clear, however, that developing countries cannot sustain the level of resources required for tuberculosis control without support from external agencies. It is important to evaluate the effect of DOTS programmes before rates of multidrug resistant tuberculosis rise to such levels that evaluation is impossible. Subsidising tuberculosis treatment in developing countries should be a long term commitment.

    References

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • Source of funding: Department for International Development, UK.

    • For correspondence: Dr J D Walley, Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9PL, England, UK. Fax +44 (0)113 246 0899.

    • * See glossary.

    • Information provided by author.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.