rss
Evid Based Med 2001;6:175 doi:10.1136/ebm.6.6.175
  • Therapeutics

Gemfibrozil reduced the risk for stroke in men with coronary heart disease and low concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol


 
 QUESTION: In men with coronary artery disease and low concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, is gemfibrozil effective for preventing stroke?

Design

Randomised {allocation concealed*}, blinded {patients, outcome assessors, and study personnel},* placebo-controlled trial with mean 5.1 years of follow up (Veterans Affairs HDL Cholesterol Intervention Trial [VA-HIT]).

Setting

20 Veterans Affairs medical centres in the USA.

Patients

2531 men who were < 74 years of age (mean age 64 y) and had a confirmed diagnosis of coronary artery disease, an HDL cholesterol level < 1.03 mmol/l, a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < 3.6 mmol/l, and a triglyceride level < 3.39 mmol/l. Follow up was complete.

Intervention

1264 men were allocated to gemfibrozil 1200 mg/d, and 1267 were allocated to placebo. The patients were seen every 3 months by the study coordinator.

Main outcome measures

Incidence of first strokes and fatal strokes.

Main results

{Analysis was by intention to treat.} Fewer patients who received gemfibrozil had a stroke than did patients who received placebo (p=0.036) (table). The groups did not differ for fatal strokes (3 [0.2%] v 9 [0.7%], {p=0.15}). 90% of all strokes were ischaemic, and the greatest benefit of gemfibrozil was seen in a reduction of atherothrombotic strokes (3 [5%] v 16 [21%], {unadjusted p=0.0028}§).

Gemfibrozil v placebo for preventing strokes in men with coronary artery disease and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at mean 5.1 years¶

Conclusion

In men with coronary artery disease and low concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, gemfibrozil reduced the risk for stroke.


 
 QUESTION: In men with coronary artery disease and low concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, is gemfibrozil effective for preventing stroke?

Footnotes

  • Sources of funding: Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development, and Parke-Davis.

  • For correspondence: Dr H B Rubins, Section of General Internal Medicine (1110), VAMC, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA. Fax +1 612 725 2118.

  • * See glossary.

  • Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, et al. N Engl J Med 1999;342:410–8.

  • p Value provided by author.

  • § p Value calculated from data in article.

Commentary

  1. Geoffrey A Donnan, MD
  1. National Stroke Research Institute Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

      The study by Rubins et al is important because it is the first to show that in patients with coronary artery disease, the risk for subsequent stroke (mainly non-fatal atherothrombotic stroke) may be reduced with a fibrate (in this case, gemfibrozil). The results of this study need to be put in the context of similar findings in patients with coronary artery disease who were treated with a statin.1

      Although the clinical characteristics of the patients in both studies were reasonably similar, Rubins et al recruited patients in whom the predominant lipid abnormality was a low HDL level; however, the investigators of the LIPID (Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease) study recruited patients with a broad range of cholesterol concentrations.1

      What does this mean to practising clinicians? In essence, we now have a choice of agents that may be useful in protecting patients with coronary artery disease from stroke. One could argue that gemfibrozil may be more helpful in patients with low HDL concentrations, but a more general effect has not been ruled out. As yet, we have no information about whether protection shown in either trial is a class effect or relates to each agent specifically. Similarly, we do not know the effect of combining these agents. As is often the case, this study represents a promising development, but more questions need to be answered.

      References

      Register for free content


      Free archive
      The full back archive is now available for EBM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
      Register to access the free archive >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.