You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Therapeutics
Losartan reduced strokes and new onset diabetes more than atenolol in essential hypertension

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.7.6.174

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    (2002) Lancet 359, 995; Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al, for the LIFE study group.. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.. Mar 23;. :. –1003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

    
 
 QUESTION: In patients with essential hypertension and signs of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), is losartan-based therapy more effective than atenolol-based therapy?

    Design

    Randomised (unclear allocation concealment*), blinded (patients and monitoring committee),* controlled trial with ≥4 years follow-up.

    Setting

    Multicentre trial in Europe and the United States.

    Patients

    9222 patients 55 to 80 years of age (mean age 67 y, 54% women) with hypertension (sitting blood pressure [BP] after 1 to 2 wks of placebo of 160 to 200 mm Hg systolic, 95 to 115 mm Hg diastolic, or both) and electrocardiographical signs of LVH. Exclusion criteria included secondary hypertension; myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke within the previous 6 months; angina pectoris requiring treatment with β-blockers or calcium antagonists; and heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%. Follow-up was 99%.

    Intervention

    Patients were allocated to losartan based therapy (n = 4605) or atenolol based therapy (n = 4588). Losartan and atenolol were started at 50 mg/day, combined with low dose hydrochlorothiazide if needed and …

    View Full Text